'It's not a pipe dream': Oilsands company developing project to wipe out its emissions

Kyle Bakx, CBC News, October 1, 2019

An Alberta oilpatch company is looking for government support toward a new project that aims to erase emissions from its oilsands facility and possibly from other nearby oil-producing operations.

MEG Energy is proposing to capture greenhouse gas emissions and bury them below the surface.

The company wants to achieve net-zero emissions and chief executive Derek Evans said this new development actually provides a tangible way to reach that goal.

"It isn't a pipe dream," he said.

"We're actually well beyond the dreaming stage. We've identified a place where we think we can sequester our greenhouse gas emissions. We think it's large enough to handle not only ours, but a large component of the people in the Christina Lake area and we think it's doable," he said.

Christina Lake is an area about 150 kilomtres south of Fort McMurray that is well-populated by oilsands development.

MEG Energy will provide more details within the next 12 months, according to Evans, and the pilot project should be operational within the next two years.

"We're going to focus on net-zero emissions because we believe that's the end game and that's where we need to get to as quickly as possible," he said.

Evans made the comments during a wide-ranging interview with CBC News about the state of the industry and the current federal election campaign. The company would not provide any additional information about the carbon capture project such as its total cost, how much government funding it is pursuing or whether it is partnering with other oilsands companies.

Carbon capture growth

MEG Energy's facility already has above-average greenhouse gas performance compared to other oilsands projects, according to Kevin Birn, an analyst with IHS Markit. A carbon capture investment of this kind has the potential to create some of the lowest greenhouse gas intensive oil in North America, from a production standpoint.

"You're talking about taking a resource that, I think, has a reputation for being higher carbon," said Birn. "Removing the upstream emission profile from it would be massive."

Read rest of article here